St Nicholas Buccleuch Parish Church
  • Home
    • Activities
  • Proposed Union with Newbattle
  • Services
    • Order of Service
  • About
    • Values
    • Coffee Shop
    • Organs
    • History
    • Hall
    • Twinning
    • Picture Gallery
  • Contact
  • Where we are
  • Donate
  • Genealogy
  • Data Protection and Privacy

Sermon: Sunday 23rd November, 2014

23/11/2014

0 Comments

 
Twice in the last ten days, I have heard people read our gospel reading, but stop at the end of verse forty of our gospel reading. That’s the verse which reads, “The King will reply, ‘I tell you the truth, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for me.’” I can see why they did so. It is a lovely place to finish, a happy ending, warm words of commendation from the King to his good servants. It is nice to finish there because what comes after is not at all nice. The language of the next verses is fearful. Hellfire and damnation are the lot of the people who have fallen short. It is something we would rather not think about. It is something too terrible to imagine.

Yet the stories Matthew tells in his Gospel have led up to this point. At the beginning of the chapter, there is the parable Jesus told about the wise and foolish bridesmaids, about those who were prepared for the unexpected delay of the bridegroom and had extra oil with them and those who were unprepared and were ultimately shut out from the wedding feast. In that parable, Jesus taught his followers about his coming again and told them, subtly but clearly, that they were to expect  his return at any time, but that they might have to wait a long time.

Coming next in the Gospel of Matthew is the story we read last week, of the rich man who went abroad, leaving his money with his servants to invest on his behalf. As we know, one servant was given five talents, the next one, two and the third one just the one, even though that was still a very considerable sum. When the master returned, he called his servants to account, and the first two had dared to invest the money with which they had been entrusted, and they were warmly commended by their master. The last, the servant to whom just the one talent had been entrusted, had been so afraid of the master that he had buried the money, lest he lose any of it. The master was angry because of his timidity, for his not daring to use the talent he had been given.

In this parable, Jesus was developing the theme started in the story of the wise and foolish bridesmaids. In both, there is a period when the person who is served is away. In both, the action takes place upon his arrival or return. In both, there is a reckoning with some being commended and some being found wanting. In both, the wise ones, the obedient ones, the ones who were ready to serve the bridegroom or the master are rewarded by entering into his joyful celebration and the others, the foolish bridesmaids and the timid servant are punished by exclusion.

What we have, therefore, are two stories which are leading us in a particular direction, two stories about serving Christ, about waiting for him and being ready for him. The first introduces the idea of readiness, the second begins to indicate what we should be doing while he is away. In the parable of the talents, the servants have nothing except what the master gives them. They have no power or resources except what comes from him, though, as we noted, these are very considerable. In using what he gives them, in effect they are carrying on his work in the master’s absence. The one who does not use what he is given is, in effect, preventing his master’s work. When it is put like that, it is easy to see why the master is so angry. It is not that the servant is lazy or incompetent. It is not that the master has missed out on making a profit; it is that the third servant’s inaction has positively worked against the master’s interests. Strip away all the elements of the story to get the raw meaning and this is what you get. Those who claim to follow Christ but do not do his work, actually work against Christ. One is reminded of the phrase, “For evil to flourish, it is only necessary for good people to do nothing.”

But these stories do not complete the picture. Be prepared, the first tells us, and we ask, what are we to do to be prepared? Do Christ’s work, the second tells us, that’s how to be prepared, but we ask, what is Christ’s work? We need a third story, and Jesus tells it, starting this time with the image of a shepherd, separating his sheep from his goats. In those days, it was common to herd both sheep and goats together but it was necessary from time to time to separate them, for shearing, for milking, for over-wintering, because the sheep were hardy and could stay outside but the goats could not live through cold winter nights without shelter. But there is a terrible urgency about Jesus by this time – we are reading today the last story he told, according to Matthew, before the whirlwind of the events of his arrest, trial and crucifixion was unleashed. Quickly he abandons the image of the shepherd to speak as directly as possible. Gone is the imagery of the previous stories, the bridegroom, the rich business man. Now Christ is saying, I am the king and this is what I will do when I return to judge. All the nations will be gathered before me, but I will not judge them as nations. This is not democracy. I will judge each person. This is about individual responsibility. This is about individual accountability. And these are the terms upon which I with judge.

At last, we find out what the work which has has to be done actually consists of, and it is not perhaps what one might expect, if one had no prior knowledge of the kind of king and master Jesus is. Feeding the hungry, giving water to the thirsty, welcoming the stranger into your home, clothing the naked, looking after the ill, caring for those who are oppressed. These aren’t great and mighty deeds, requiring strength or ingenuity or courage. They are deeds of compassion, exactly the kind of things which would carry on the work of the king who comforted the bereaved, who stood up for the persecuted, healed the sick, fed the hungry crowds, provided drink at a wedding. Let’s not forget, in the midst of our wonder at the miracles Jesus performed, that so many of them were compassionate responses to everyday needs, the needs we all experience, hunger, thirst, illness, the need for comfort when we grieve, the need for protection when we are being got at.

As people say, it’s not exactly rocket science. You don’t have to be brain of Britain to work out what the work is Jesus requires of us. It is clear from the story Jesus tells his disciples about the day of judgement.

“Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?’”

They are genuinely surprised. They had not suspected. The good they had done had been done instinctively. The righteous are the people who see needs and do something about them. There’s the Good Samaritan. There’s Martha feeding all her guests. There are the men who dug through a roof and lowered their crippled friend down to Jesus. Here’s the person who takes a friend to hospital. Here are the volunteers in a homeless shelter or a charity shop. Here’s the person who takes a pot of soup round to an elderly neighbour. It’s not exactly rocket science. It is instinctive compassion.

But the others were just as surprised. They ask the same question as the righteous. ‘We never saw you,’ they say to Jesus. It would be tempting to think of this as a minor lapse – looking in the wrong place through no fault of their own. But remember the third servant. Those who do not do Christ’s work, even by doing nothing, are working against him.

This story brings us face to face with Christ our king, the king who will ultimately judge each one of us. It tells us how he wants to be served by the people he has called to him. It gives us a clear choice, to emulate the instinctive compassion of Christ or to ignore the needs of others, and it reminds us of the consequences of that choice, entering into the pleasure of Christ or enduring his anger. As we go forward from next week into the season of Advent and prepare ourselves for the celebration of our Saviour’s birth we would do well to hold in mind how Matthew’s Gospel proceeds from this point, through the story of the suffering, the death and the resurrection of Christ. It is in these days in Jerusalem that we see the true measure of Christ, who asks us to care for the suffering because he knows exactly what it is to suffer.

Amen.

0 Comments

Sermon: Sunday 16th November, 2014

16/11/2014

0 Comments

 
On Wednesday, five banks were fined a total of £2bn. They were found guilty of manipulating currency exchange rates in transactions worth trillions of pounds. Do you have any idea what these numbers mean? Have you the faintest idea of how many suitcases you would need to carry a billion pounds in used twenties, or how many lorries you’d need to transport a trillion pound coins? Me neither. But we’ve somehow got used to hearing about these stupendous amounts of money, so used that they have lost their power to impress.

The same is true of the parable we have heard again this morning. Have you any idea how much a talent, for it was a unity of money before the word, largely because of this parable, came to mean ‘a special ability’, was worth? I do know this one. It was worth as much as an average worker could expect to earn in fifteen years. It would take seventy-five years to earn the amount entrusted to the first servant in the story. Jesus is talking about stupendous sums. Perhaps that should make us sit up and take notice of this very familiar story once again. But that’s not the only reason.

Here’s an interpretation of this story which you’ve probably heard before. God gives us gifts, skills and resources – talents in their modern sense – and expects us to use them. If we do, we will be rewarded. If we don’t, he’ll be very angry with us, and we won’t like that at all. We are to work hard basically to avoid God’s wrath. That seems obvious, and would lead to a very short sermon. But is that what the parable is really saying? Is that what Jesus was teaching?

When you look closely at the parable, there is a lot in it which is actually quite disturbing. If we assume that the man who goes away is Jesus, what does that imply? That Jesus is fantastically wealthy, and wants above all to increase that wealth, that he rewards success, that he is harsh, that he “reaps where he does not sow”, that he punishes failure? You could draw all those conclusions if you wished, but I’m not sure you’d be right. That Jesus just doesn’t sound like the Jesus who stopped a woman being stoned for adultery, or who healed a woman of years of bleeding, or fed a huge crowd with just a small amount of fish and bread, or put himself on chummy terms with Zaccheus the tax collector, or who shed his own blood on the cross.

So let’s step back and look at this story afresh, and let’s start with the money. There’s so much of it, and that’s surely part of the point. These are numbers beyond our reasonable comprehension, so let’s not allow them to be a distraction. Let’s think, instead, about what they may stand for.

To do that, we have to look at the context of this story. Last week, we read the parable of the wise and foolish bridesmaids. Next week, we will hear Jesus speaking quite explicitly about his return. All three readings are from Matthew chapter twenty-five. All these stories and sayings are grouped together just as Jesus nears Jerusalem for the last time. It is a time of great personal risk. The stakes are high. He knows he is leaving, so to speak. The stories reflect all this. They are full of heightened tension, full of drama.

Jesus doesn’t introduce this story at all. He doesn’t give any clues to its interpretation. Instead, he launches straight in to describing a wealthy man who, before he goes away on a journey, decides to invest his money. He distributes unequal amounts among three slaves. He gives them no instructions, and then he’s off.

The first one senses an opportunity, or a duty, and goes and engages in a commercial venture. He’s good at it, and doubles his master’s money. The second does the same. But why tell of two servants, achieving proportionately identical outcomes, both able to return twice what had been invested in them. The answer is in the story. The master gave to each what he judged they were able to handle.

Which raises an interesting question. Who was the most able? If you want to make a lot of money, starting out rich makes it a lot easier than if you start our poor. Which, in a way, brings us to the third slave, the one to whom only one talent was entrusted.

Let’s get some things straight about him. He is not a bad man. In fact, he is quite a sensible man, and an articulate man too. He’s an honest man, who has kept the money safe, and returned it, every penny of it. He’s not at all smug either, which is an accusation which could fairly be levelled at the others. In Jesus’ day, burying money and other valuables was considered a good way of keeping them safe. Furthermore, usury, the lending of money for interest, was forbidden in Jewish law. It’s a bit strange that the wealthy man tells him he could at least have done that.

What the third servant is, though, and this is where I think he went wrong, is a man who was afraid. He was afraid of the master and he was afraid of losing his master’s money. And the other two hadn’t been. They had been prepared to take the risk. They had been prepared to turn up on the day of reckoning and say, “We invested it all but the business went bust. Sorry.”

Had that happened, what, I wonder, would have been the reaction of the master? As a businessman, he must have understood the nature, the inherent riskiness, of business and investment. I cannot imagine that he would have been harsh on a servant who had tried his best, but had failed to make money.

So I’m drawn to the conclusion that what matters here is not the return on the investment, the doubling of the money, but the effort of investing. That’s even more true when we remind ourselves that this is only a story and the characters and the money and the situation they play out all have symbolic meaning.

While I do not think we should equate the master too closely with Jesus, in certain regards, he is. As in the story, Jesus trusts us with responsibility commensurate with our talents. As in the story, Jesus trusts us to take the initiative and does not prescribe a course of action.

The servants, though, are maybe more directly readable as representing those who seek to serve Jesus, or think they serve Jesus. In the story, the two who receive commendation, and greater responsibility, are the ones who take the risks. The one who receives condemnation is the one who plays it safe. And, if we remind ourselves to think of this story less in monetary terms, the sin of the third servant, the sin of playing it safe, may be seen not as not taking the opportunity to make money, but rather not daring to care, not risking to love, not living up to the full potential of our humanity, not putting much effort in, being over cautious and over prudent, allowing ourselves to think we’re not much good and there will always be someone better than us for whatever the task is, and so why should we bother.

There’s something about this which applies to life in general. I think that what Jesus is saying is that playing it safe – not caring, not loving passionately, not investing yourself, not risking anything – is a bit like death, not really life at all, certainly not life in all its fullness, and even a bit like being banished to the outer darkness.

And there’s something about this which applies to church life in particular. For most of us, religion and personal faith are not really risky ventures. Not at all, in fact. Faith seems more like a personal comfort zone. Many think that it is about personal security here and in the hereafter. To many, faith is only about believing ideas in our heads about God and Jesus, holding a list of beliefs we more or less subscribe to intellectually. Many, because this is what they have been taught, think that faith is about getting their personal theology right and then living a good life by avoiding bad things.

Not so. Faith is not like that. Faith is about life, and the life Jesus invites us into is the life of discipleship. Subtly, he is telling us something. For most, at least in our culture, the life of discipleship is not really going to involve risk or danger – after all, the servants who took the plunge made incredible returns. Rather, it is about living less cautious lives, daring to lose as well as to gain, daring to love and risking being hurt, daring to rejoice and risking being ridiculed.

The life of faith is not about believing ideas about Jesus. It is about following him. And following him means investing the lives and the gifts and the talents he has given us, using them and living to the full. It is about being bold, brave sometimes, about reaching high and caring deeply. It is about being confident, confident in ourselves because who we are and what we have all comes from God.

Amen.

0 Comments

Sermon: Sunday 9th November, 2014

12/11/2014

0 Comments

 
Amos is an uncompromising prophet, a person clearly unafraid to speak his mind. He pulls no punches and his words are deeply unsettling. Though writing for a particular situation and a particular set of historical circumstances, his words echo down the centuries and issue a challenge to whoever reads them, and today that is us, and I find myself deeply challenged by them. Here we are, gathered as we are week after week, in a solemn assembly, gathered in worship of God, on the day of the week we sometimes refer to as the Lord’s day, and it sounds terribly, from what Amos is saying, that this is all wrong, that it gives no pleasure to God.

Of course, Amos was writing in his own time, in his own situation, calling into question certain contemporary religious practices.  And these practices are no longer our practices. We do not bring fatted animals. We do not make sacrifices of animals or offerings of grain. But does that let us off the hook? I rather think I know what Amos would say. I’m sure he’d tell us it doesn’t.

So we need to look at our own worship practice, in the light of what Amos was saying, and ask if we have anything to learn. It is difficult to know exactly, from this distance, what Amos was so angry about, but I think we can hazard a reasonable guess. He was convinced that the Israelites’ worship practices were more about what the worshippers wanted, about what served their perceived needs, than about what was actually pleasing to God. They had their rituals and ceremonies. They had their songs and the music of their harps. They had the places they considered sacred. And, I’m sure, it all looked very good. I’m sure it all felt very satisfying. I’m sure that those who worshipped in this way felt their needs met, their hearts uplifted, their obligations fulfilled. In other words, it had become comfortable; worship suited the worshippers, and what God actually desired had become lost.

That constitutes a challenge to any worshipping community. Is what we do for us, or for God? Does what is important become this – the singing the hymns and songs that we like, sitting in the places where we feel comfortable, doing things which, in their familiarity, are no longer challenging? For, if that is the case, if what we are doing is only what is easy and familiar and comfortable, then Amos tells us, in his shocking, angry way, that we are no longer truly worshipping. God does not want all the stuff which simply serves to make us feel good. What God wants, he says, is lives of righteousness, lives of justice. These things are neither easy nor comfortable. These cost us sacrifices greater than grain or money. But justice and righteousness are what God wants, are how God is truly honoured. Nothing else can substitute.

This is not a comfortable message. But this is not a comfortable day. This is a day on which we consider sacrifice, not in dispassionate, academic terms, but in awe of the sacrifices asked and given by generations past, by generations passing, and by young men and women of the present generations to whom the future should belong. Do our solemn assemblies, our festivals, honour them? Only, Amos tells us, only if we offer to God lives of justice and righteousness.

And that must mean lives changed by what we remember today. That must mean lives committed never to making again the mistakes made before. That means lives in which pride and privilege are not allowed to run rampant through our relations with one another.

In our Gospel reading, Jesus tells a story which contains a powerful image, the image of the oil lamp. An oil lamp which must be kept lit.

The lamp, or lamps rather, are in the hands of bridesmaids at a wedding, whose task it was to keep a look out for the groom coming to the bride’s house in order to escort her to his and to the great wedding banquet prepared there. From this scene, Jesus draws out an image of what the Kingdom of Heaven will be like and of how we ought to live while awaiting it. Clearly, we are supposed to live like the wise bridesmaids, not the foolish ones. But what does this mean?

Despite the last line in the story, it does not mean that we are to remain in a state of constant alertness. All the bridesmaids sleep, not just the foolish ones. A time of drowsiness is not what marks out the folly of the foolish ones. Neither does it mean that we are to be entirely self sufficient. The bridesmaids were only responsible for the lamps and the oil; the groom’s great banquet is provided for them, not by them. Rather, it has something to do with the quality of our waiting. And I would like to say two things about that.

First, we should not wait alone. As people expecting the coming Kingdom of God, we should gather together and wait together. And second, we should not be afraid to use the things we have, the oil in our lamps, so to speak. We live in hope that justice will roll down like waters, and righteousness like a never ending stream.

Today, we bear witness, not only to the sacrifice of the past but to the hope for the future – hope for a future of justice, of righteousness, of peace; hope for a future built from faith and hope and love. These are the provisions for living which God gives us now in the time before eternity, not tools for gaining entry into it. These things are the light of the lamps which today we seek to keep lit, the lamps of remembrance, casting the light of God, light which dispels darkness, which shines with his peace and his love.

Amen.

0 Comments

Sermon: Sunday 2nd November, 2014

3/11/2014

0 Comments

 
I am not a gifted linguist. I've only ever really got to grips with English. Back when I was a student, I tried to study Hebrew. After six weeks, we were to have our first test. A day or so before, I went to see Professor Johnstone, who is one of the living saints of the church, and I said to him, “I really don't think I can do this.”  And he smiled at me wryly, and said, “Well, Sandy, if you’re sure. . . ”  Just another in a long line of students who flunked Hebrew.

But today, for our study of our Gospel lesson, an appreciation of language is really important and so I am in the hands of others as I try to discern the true meaning of the words Jesus used. But, you may be thinking, the New Testament is written in Greek, not Hebrew, so what’s the problem? But the fact is, the Greek is already a translation because Jesus spoke in Aramaic, which is closely related to Hebrew. He would have known Hebrew too, because that is the language of the Scriptures he read. So, often, the words he used need to be understood in their Hebraic sense.

And one word is of primary importance this morning. That word is “Blessed”. A few weeks ago, preparing for the Give Church a Go Sunday service, I was trying to write a short explanation of the benediction, the blessing at the end of the service, and it struck me that what we often mean by the verb “to bless” when we use it in English is actually inadequate to the task of conveying what happens in the Benediction. What is ‘the blessing of God’? Is it God’s approval? Is it a promise of happiness? Is it a request for divine favour? None of these quite hit the mark. And if we read the list of nine Beatitudes from Matthew’s Gospel with those kinds of definition of blessing in mind, we will not properly understand what Jesus was saying. Happy are those who mourn simply does not make sense.

So we need to go back to the Hebrew because it is there that we find the meaning which Jesus would have had in mind when he used the word which has eventually been translated for us as “blessed”. But don’t expect it to be wholly straightforward. There are two Hebrew words which are rendered in English as “blessing” or “blessed”. Neither of them carry the connotations of a life of ease or pleasure which the notion of being blessed now so often conveys.

For example, in Psalm 103, we read, “Bless the Lord, my soul.” And in the Book of Numbers, we find the blessing we sing at every baptism. On these occasions, the Hebrew word is barak, which means ‘to bow down’ or ‘to stoop down’.  The psalmist sings – bow down before the Lord, my soul. Be humble before God. In Numbers, the form of blessing which God gave to Aaron with which to pronounce blessing on the Israelites was this, “The Lord bless you and keep you.” In other words, God will stoop down to you, he will come to your level and be close to you. That is a rather lovely image of blessing.

But in Psalm 1, which in many ways gives Jesus the pattern for his teaching in the Sermon on the Mount, which begins with the Beatitudes, a different word is used. Here the word translated for us as ‘blessed’ is ’ashar, which means to find the right to road. Here, the psalmist to saying, “The person who does not walk in the counsel of the wicked is on the right road.”

Suddenly, the nine Beatitudes begin to reveal their meaning in a way that dispels confusion. If blessing, in the sense it is used here, is about finding or being on the right road, on the right path, doing the right thing, then what Jesus is saying doesn’t seem nearly so paradoxical.

In the way Matthew orders his account of the life of Jesus, this is Jesus’ first big speech. It lays out his manifesto for his ministry. It unfolds his interpretation of the Law which he invites his followers to learn from and share.

So he starts by saying that you are on the right road if you are poor in spirit. Those who know they lack something will go looking to meet that need, and if you know you are poor in spirit, you are on the right road if you are on the road with Jesus, for he surely leads to God.

Then he says, you are on the right road if you mourn. I often point out to couples at weddings that love doesn't just make you feel good and feel happy. It also, if it is true love, exposes you to the risk, the inevitability, of real pain and sadness. Jesus says that we are on the right road if we love truly enough to mourn when the ones we love are lost to us.

He goes on. We are on the right road when we are meek because then our behaviour will be kind and gentle and pleasing to God. We are on the right road when we hunger and thirst for righteousness, for that will be the case if we care. We will be on the right road if we are merciful, if we are pure in heart, not seeking our own selfish ends, if we are peacemakers, because although these are hard, even dangerous things to do, they will reduce conflict and increase justice, and we will be partnering with God in his work. We are on the right road when we are persecuted and reviled, not, of course for being nasty, but for aligning ourselves with Christ, standing for God’s truth against those who seek rather to serve only themselves.

Each Beatitude also contains a promise – that we will be included in the kingdom of heaven, that we will be comforted, that we will inherit the earth, that we will be filled, receive mercy, see God and be called God’s children. These are promises of Christ, that when we are on the right road, these things will be ours. Comfort, mercy, being called God’s children, are confirmation that we are on the right road; seeing God and being included in the kingdom of heaven are confirmation that we have been on the right road.

None of the Beatitudes are instructions; all are simply indications that we are doing the right thing, that we are on the way with Christ. And the fact that they are not instructions is important because they are less about the character of Christians and more about the nature of God. For God is caring and comforting, merciful and just, the confronter of evil and the bringer of peace. These things are God’s work and Christ invites us to join in the work of God.

It is good to read this on All Saints’ Sunday, for it is a useful corrective to the idea of sainthood as being something inaccessibly extraordinary. It is not. It is a matter of placing our feet on the road of discipleship, the path of faithfulness, and walking, with Jesus, and with one another.

Amen.
0 Comments

    Author

    Posts here are by Sandy Horsburgh, Minister of St Nicholas Buccleuch Parish Church.

    Archives

    December 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    September 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Dalkeith: St Nicholas Buccleuch Parish Church (Church of Scotland) 119 High Street, Dalkeith, EH21 1AX
Scottish Charity Number SC014158